1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2007 Saturn Aura
To start off, 2007 Saturn Aura is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Saturn Aura (252 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Aura should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Saturn Aura. (340 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Saturn Aura.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2007 Saturn Aura | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Econoline | Aura |
Year Released | 1999 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4450 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |