1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Econoline | Epica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
