1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (306 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 615 kg more than 2008 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan 350Z (364 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2008 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | 350Z |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 364 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |