1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 20 kg more than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | Almera |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2540 mm |
