1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (212 HP @ 4450 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2010 Scion tC. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 Scion tC.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion tC. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Ford | Scion |
Model | Econoline | tC |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4450 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |