1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Scion xB is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2010 Scion xB. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 Scion xB.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion xB. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2010 Scion xB | |
Make | Ford | Scion |
Model | Econoline | xB |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4249 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2601 mm |