1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Econoline | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |