1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2012 GMC Sierra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 302 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 104 kg more than 2012 GMC Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 GMC Sierra. (413 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2012 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econoline | Sierra |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 413 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2415 kg | 2311 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3645 mm |