1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 572 kg more than 2012 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (474 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econoline | XJ |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3157 mm |