1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 597 kg more than 2012 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Wrangler. (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Econoline | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7275 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 575 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2946 mm |