1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 712 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | S60 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2776 mm |