1999 Ford F-150 vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Ford F-150 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1999 Ford F-150. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 362 kg more than 1999 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford F-150 | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | F-150 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 6392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5740 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2830 mm |