1999 Ford F-150 vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1999 Ford F-150 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford F-150 (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford F-150 weights approximately 238 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford F-150 (393 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford F-150 | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5740 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |