1999 Ford F-150 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford F-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1999 Ford F-150. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 172 kg more than 1999 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford F-150 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | F-150 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5740 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2580 mm |