1999 Ford F-150 vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford F-150 (360 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Because 1999 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford F-150 (597 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm). This means 1999 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford F-150 | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-150 | MX-Flexa |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |
