1999 Ford F-150 vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2006 Mazda DrifterX. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda DrifterX.
Because 1999 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda DrifterX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford F-150 | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-150 | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3010 mm |
