1999 Ford Falcon vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (374 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Falcon | Fronte |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2060 mm |