1999 Ford Falcon vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 685 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Taunus |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3150 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |