1999 Ford Falcon vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z

To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 330 kg more than 1978 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (374 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 280Z. 1978 Datsun 280Z has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Datsun 280Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Falcon 1978 Datsun 280Z
Make Ford Datsun
Model Falcon 280Z
Year Released 1999 1978
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 2753 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 232 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 374 Nm 221 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 8.3:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1200 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4399 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1631 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2304 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]