1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Falcon | M72 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |