1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 141 kg more than 1999 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | B3000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1671 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |