1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Etude. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Etude. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 485 kg more than 2005 Mazda Etude. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (374 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Etude |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1594 cc |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |