1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1999 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Cruze |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2685 mm |