1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 SsangYong Kyron

To start off, 2012 SsangYong Kyron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2012 SsangYong Kyron. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2012 SsangYong Kyron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Kyron weights approximately 367 kg more than 1999 Ford Falcon.

Because 2012 SsangYong Kyron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Kyron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (374 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 SsangYong Kyron. (310 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 SsangYong Kyron. 2012 SsangYong Kyron has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Kyron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Falcon 2012 SsangYong Kyron
Make Ford SsangYong
Model Falcon Kyron
Year Released 1999 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 232 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 374 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 86.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 85.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1897 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1890 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 75 L