1999 Ford Focus vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1999 Ford Focus. (73 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 340 kg more than 1999 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Focus. (125 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Focus. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Focus has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Focus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Focus | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Focus | ATS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |