1999 Ford Ka vs. 1965 Saab MC
To start off, 1999 Ford Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Ka (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1965 Saab MC. (54 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1965 Saab MC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Saab MC weights approximately 8 kg more than 1999 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Saab MC. (91 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Saab MC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Ka | 1965 Saab MC | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Ka | MC |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 73 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2500 mm |
