1999 Ford Ka vs. 1992 Holden Barina
To start off, 1999 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Barina (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1999 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Ka weights approximately 94 kg more than 1992 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Barina. (102 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Ka | 1992 Holden Barina | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ka | Barina |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2370 mm |