1999 Ford Mondeo vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1999 Ford Mondeo. (128 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Mondeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mondeo. (181 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mondeo | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mondeo | Raider |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 83 L |