1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (256 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 198 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Renown |
Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 406 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |