1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1961 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 597 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 1961 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1961 Jaguar MK IX | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | MK IX |
Year Released | 1999 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 3779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |