1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 193 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 220 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |