1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 142 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Mustang | Tempest |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 3524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2930 mm |