1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Renault 8
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 355 kg more than 1964 Renault 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault 8. (99 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1964 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 8 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 853 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2280 mm |
