1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 468 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Mustang | 966 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2170 mm |