1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 607 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 323 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |