1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Reliant GTC
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant GTC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant GTC would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Reliant GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Reliant GTC weights approximately 82 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Reliant GTC (206 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 1980 Reliant GTC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1980 Reliant GTC | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Mustang | GTC |
Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 206 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 178 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 91 L |