1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 158 kg more than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (124 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1981 Renault 18 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 18 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |
