1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 386 kg more than 1982 Renault 9.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 9 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |
