1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Renault 25
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,456 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Renault 25 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 25. (72 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1985 Renault 25 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 25 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 72 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 233 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |