1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Opel Omega
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Opel Omega weights approximately 122 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Opel Omega (162 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 1991 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1991 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Mustang | Omega |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
