1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (256 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 567 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Mustang 1991 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Mustang Clio
Year Released 1999 1991
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 1870 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 256 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4300 RPM
Torque 406 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 93 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 23.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1482 kg 915 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3720 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 43 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]