1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 378 kg more than 1991 Suzuki Swift.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1991 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Swift |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |
