1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Renault 19
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Renault 19 would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 63 kg more than 1995 Renault 19.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault 19. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 1995 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 19 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |