1999 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 512 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | Mini |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
