1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |
