1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 138 kg more than 2001 Saturn SC.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Saturn SC. (155 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 2001 Saturn SC | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Mustang | SC |
Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 155 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |