1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 208 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (300 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Clio |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1416 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
