1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |
