1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Rover 45
To start off, 2006 Rover 45 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 28 kg more than 2006 Rover 45.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 45. (123 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 2006 Rover 45 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Mustang | 45 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 123 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |