1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 202 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (223 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Mustang | Patriot |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 223 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 51 L |